How Peripherals Affect Analog Output Accuracy

Sept. 26, 2010

David W. Spitzer, P.E. What is the approximate accuracy of the analog signal for a flow measurement system where the output of a linear flowmeter with 1 percent of

David W. Spitzer, P.E.

What is the approximate accuracy of the analog signal for a flow measurement system where the output of a linear flowmeter with 1 percent of rate accuracy is fed to a control system input board that has an accuracy of 0.01 percent?

A. 0.50 percent of rate
B. 1.00 percent of rate
C. 1.01 percent of rate
D. 2.00 percent of rate
E. None of the above

Commentary
The flowmeter portion of a flow measurement system can be thought of as consisting of a primary element, a transmitter, and a signal converter. The primary element is generally in contact with the flowing fluid (but may not necessarily be wetted). The transmitter processes the signal from the primary element to produce the flow measurement. The signal converter changes the flow measurement into an instrument signal (such as 4-20 mA) for transmission to another device.

The stated accuracy of the flowmeter (1 percent of rate) typically refers to the accuracy of the primary element and transmitter portions of the flow measurement system. Examination of the flowmeter specifications will likely reveal there is a signal converter accuracy that should be added to the stated accuracy to reflect the accuracy of the analog output. The signal converter accuracy is typically expressed as a percentage of full scale, so its value expressed as a percentage of flowrate will be different at different flowrates. Therefore, answers A, B, C, and D are not correct. Answer E is correct. Further, the accuracy of the control system input board should not be considered in calculating the accuracy of the analog output.

Additional Complicating Factors
The overall flow measurement system error should include all the components in the system. As such, it should include the accuracy of the control system input board and subsequent calculations. It should be noted that while some system inputs can exhibit accuracies on the order of 0.01 percent of full scale, other system inputs can exhibit accuracies as high as 0.4 percent of full scale. These poorer accuracies can profoundly degrade measurement accuracy when the flow is low in the flow range.

David W. Spitzer, P.E., is a regular contributor to Flow Control. He has more than 30 years of experience in specifying, building, installing, startup, and troubleshooting process control instrumentation. He has developed and taught seminars for over 20 years and is a member of ISA and belongs to the ASME MFC and ISO TC30 committees. Mr. Spitzer has written a number of books concerning the application and use of fluid handling technology, including the popular “Consumer Guide” series, which compares flowmeters by supplier. Mr. Spitzer is currently a principal in Spitzer and Boyes LLC, offering engineering, product development, marketing, and distribution consulting for manufacturing and automation companies. He can be reached at 845 623-1830.

www.spitzerandboyes.com

Sponsored Recommendations

Clean-in-Place (CIP) Solutions for Life Sciences Process Manufacturing

Learn how Emerson's measurement instrumentation can improve safety and reduce cross-contamination during CIP processes for life sciences process manufacturing.

Wireless Pressure Monitoring at Mining Flotation Cell

Eliminate operator rounds and improve flotation cell efficiency using reliable, wireless technology

Green hydrogen producer ensures quality of the network’s gas blend using a gas chromatograph

Case Study: Revolutionizing Green Hydrogen Blending with Precise Monitoring.

Overcome Measurement Challenges in Life Sciences

See how Emerson's best-in-class measurement instrumentation can help you overcome your toughest life sciences manufacturing challenges.