What is the approximate flow measurement error associated with a differential-pressure flowmeter for liquid service operating at a pressure of four bar where the differential-pressure transmitter is calibrated for 100 inches of water column, and the impulse tubing on the high side of the transmitter has a 10-inch vertical bubble of non-condensable gas?

A. 1 percent
B. 2 percent
C. 5 percent
D. 10 percent
E. None of the above

Commentary

The 10-inch error at full scale flow is 10 percent of the full-scale differential pressure. This error represents an approximate 5 percent flow error at the full-scale flowrate. However, the process pressure will compress the bubble that is initially present at startup, so Answer C and Answer D are not correct.

At operating pressure, the non-condensable gas will be compressed by a factor of approximately [(4 bar + 1 bar)/1 bar] or 5. Therefore, the height of the bubble will be approximately 10/5 inches, or two inches. A two-inch error is 2 percent of the full-scale differential pressure and represents approximately 1 percent flow error at the full-scale flowrate. Therefore, Answer B is not correct.

The approximate two-inch water column error associated with the bubble is independent of the operating flowrate. By way of example, the error associated with the bubble is two inches of water column when the flow is the 10 percent or 100 percent of full-scale flow. At 100 percent of full-scale flow, the flow error is approximately 1 percent. However at 10 percent of flow, the flow error attributable to the bubble (2 inches of water column) is larger than the differential pressure measurement (1 inch of water column). In other words, the flow measurement error varies with the operating flowrate, so Answer A is not correct. Answer E is correct (except at 100 percent of full scale flow).

Additional complicating factors

The above analysis presumes that the bubble height is a function of starting up the impulse tubing from an empty condition. In operation, non-condensable gas can be bled from the system and additional non-condensable gas can accumulate in the bubble. Both of these mechanisms can present additional measurement error.

 

David W. Spitzer, P.E., is a regular contributor to Flow Control. He has more than 30 years of experience in specifying, building, installing, startup and troubleshooting process control instrumentation. He has developed and taught seminars for over 20 years and is a member of ISA and belongs to the ASME MFC and ISO TC30 committees. Mr. Spitzer has written a number of books concerning the application and use of fluid handling technology, including the popular “Consumer Guide” series, which compares flowmeters by supplier. Mr. Spitzer is currently a principal in Spitzer and Boyes LLC, offering engineering, product development, marketing and distribution consulting for manufacturing and automation companies. He can be reached at 845 623-1830.

www.spitzerandboyes.com