Clamp-on ultrasonic flowmeter technology offers several major advantages over other methods of flow measurement when it comes to accounting for what, and how much, is flowing through a pipe. These benefits are derived primarily from one very important feature of clamp-on ultrasonic meters — i.e., their external sensors. Unlike traditional insert sensors, external sensors do not require pipes to be cut or operations to be halted in order to complete the installation process. Instead, the sensors are mounted on the exterior of the pipe and measure flow by transmitting acoustic signals into the pipe wall before entering the fluid.
The question may arise as to how well a meter can perform if its sensors never make contact with the medium flowing inside the pipe. But the fact is, clamp-on ultrasonic flowmeters can demonstrate a very high level of accuracy and reliability that is on par with or even better than other flow measurement technologies. The key to determining whether this type of flowmeter lives up to its potential lies in properly matching the sensors to the pipe containing the fluid to be measured.
| Lamb Wave Sensors: What’s Your Type? |
| 2-4 MHz sensors: Ideal for operation on small diameter thin-wall steel tubing, allowing the sensors to be installed on the same side of the tube. |
| 350-1500 KHz sensors: General-purpose sensors covering most flow applications. |
| 150-300 KHz sensors: Appropriate for large penstock, hydroelectric
and natural gas applications with pipe wall thicknesses up to 32 mm
(1.25 in). |
Shear Mode vs. Lamb Wave Sensors
To explain why it is so important to match the external sensors to the pipe being measured, it is first necessary to distinguish between two different types of sensors that can be utilized by clamp-on ultrasonic flowmeters — shear-mode and Lamb wave.
Shear-mode or narrow-beam sensors are the most common type used in clamp-on flow measurement and demonstrate reasonably good performance within a limited range of process conditions. Shear-mode sensors inject an acoustic signal into the pipe wall, effectively forcing the signal through the pipe and into the opposing sensor (Figure 1). Although this technology is easier and less expensive to employ than Lamb wave sensors, it is sensitive to suspended solids and bubbles exceeding a few percent by volume. This can lead to poor performance or even complete loss of the receive signal.
Shear-mode sensors are most suitable for flow surveys and check metering applications requiring the use of a portable flowmeter kit, which is not generally designed to carry a large selection of sensors. However, for the majority of dedicated metering applications, it is preferable to use Lamb wave technology for better accuracy over a wider range of liquid conditions.
![]() |
| Figure 1. Shear-mode (narrow-beam sensors) |
![]() |
| Figure 2. Lamb wave (wide-beam) sensors |
Why Variety Is Key
Clamp-on ultrasonic flowmeter suppliers have publicly acknowledged in marketing literature and academic papers the importance of offering a variety of Lamb wave sensor frequencies for optimal flow measurement results. By making a range of Lamb wave sensors available, suppliers can help pipeline operators attain the strongest possible signal and highest level of measurement accuracy.
The need for a large number of Lamb wave sensors is based on well-established scientific principles related to Lamb or plate wave behavior. Lamb waves represent a complex form of acoustic wave propagation in a plate, in which the wave velocity depends on the relationship between the plate thickness and wavelength.
![]() |
| Figure 3. Phase velocity dispersion curves for 4.7 mm steel pipe |
A pipe wall tends to oscillate with a greater amplitude when it is driven at one of its resonant frequencies. Many of these modes of resonance can occur inside a single pipe, representing multiples of the fundamental frequency known as harmonics. However, the strongest and most easily excited is the zero-order, anti-symmetric mode used by high-precision sensors.
For Lamb wave propagation, the phase velocity and signal attenuation in the bounded pipe wall are described by associated dispersion curves. These dispersion curves represent the various sinusoidal or sine wave solutions to the wave equation, where the boundary conditions are defined by the free pipe wall or plate surfaces.
As an example, the phase velocity dispersion curves for a 4.7 mm steel plate are shown in Figure 3, with each curve representing a Lamb wave (A = anti-symmetric, S = symmetric). The A0 curve represents the zero-order anti-symmetric mode. A more general dispersion graph would be plotted against the product of frequency and wall thickness (MHz·mm) since it naturally scales with wavelength to wall thickness. Following the trend of the A0 curve, the phase velocity gradually increases with increasing frequency until the limit indicated by the Rayleigh wave velocity.
| When Should You Use Lamb Wave Sensors? |
| There are several limitations that should be considered before selecting Lamb wave sensors over the more common shear wave sensors: |
| Pipe material must be compatible with Lamb wave sensors. Most available Lamb wave sensors are designed for the more common steel pipe materials (e.g., stainless steel, carbon steel); however, operation may be extended to aluminum, titanium, duplex steel, and other metals. Operating Lamb wave sensors on plastic, copper, copper-nickel, cast iron, or other low-sound velocity pipe materials will offer no benefit over the standard shear wave sensor. |
| Diameter-to-wall thickness ratio should be greater than 10-to-1. The Lamb wave frequency is inversely proportional to the pipe wall thickness. This relationship becomes problematic for small-diameter, thick-wall pipes where operation at low frequency causes reduced flow sensitivity and interference from synchronous acoustic noise traveling around the pipe instead of through the fluid. |
| Maximum wall thickness limit should not be exceeded. Lamb wave sensors are designed to operate over a range of pipe wall thicknesses, with the upper limit based on the lowest frequency sensor available from the manufacturer. Operation on a wall thickness that is much greater than the maximum allowed will result in unreliable performance and a significant reduction in signal amplitude. |
In addition to reducing signal amplitude, operation of a Lamb wave sensor too far from the ideal pipe wall frequency will also lead to an increase in flow error (Figure 3). This is primarily due to the fixed-phase velocity of the sensor, which is defined by its wedge angle and sound speed.
A Worthwhile Endeavor
Careful study of Lamb wave propagation has demonstrated a crucial fact — the likelihood of flow measurement error increases substantially if the frequency broadcast by a Lamb wave sensor is not well matched to the resonant frequency of the pipe wall. In the end, selecting the best possible sensor for a specific flow application will prove well worth the effort — for both the supplier and the end-user.
James Doorhy is the ultrasonic flow product manager for Siemens AG. Mr. Doorhy has over 20 years of experience in the ultrasonic flow industry, specializing in hydrocarbon flow and pipeline leak detection. He frequently serves as trainer and presenter for numerous international flow measurement events. He is knowledgeable on flow applications in various industries, including oil & gas, HVAC, water & wastewater, and power. Mr. Doorhy can be reached at James.Doorhy@siemens.com or 631 231-3600, ext. 1258.
References
1. Moreno, E., Otero, R., Rubio, B., Galarza, N., Otero, J., & O’Connor, J, Phase Velocity Method for Lamb Waves in Pulse Echoes, 10th European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, Moscow, 7-10 June 2010.
More


